View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
shelbyscarab
Joined: 18 Jul 2006 Posts: 1009 Location: The Buckeye State
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sandy wrote: | Hemi + 4WD+room for 4. (maybe 5)+ Really great looks+ 180 tiny LED bulbs for the back lights + a great Warranty (A fizzle?) Not around these parts. They are selling ! |
Coug & Sandy, don't get me wrong, the car in itself for what it is, is a decent looking car, and is selling. But why didn't they just come up with a new name for that model? It isn't a "charger". What design cues does it have from the original? and I've heard first hand from mopar fans that they weren't thrilled with it being a 4 dr.
I called it a fizzle in respect to it supposedly being a "charger", thats all. _________________ 1988 ASC McLaren #688 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
75coug
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 995 Location: Van Alstyne, TX
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You are right about the original "new" Charger lacking historical design cues. Interestingly, the "new new" one has quite a few. _________________ Robert
1989 ascMcLaren convertible - royal gold
1986 ascMcLaren convertible - red
1984 ascMcLaren convertible - white |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Samuelwilson
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sandy wrote: | Hemi + 4WD+room for 4. (maybe 5)+ Really great looks+ 180 tiny nice led lights bulbs for the back lights + a great Warranty (A fizzle?) Not around these parts. They are selling ! | Do you have some pics of these led lights? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|